The campaign promises to address rising prices at the grocery store signal stronger price gouging investigations, enforcement actions, and prohibitions to come
The Harris-Walz campaign is focusing on enacting “the first-ever federal ban on price gouging of food and groceries”
. And the Trump-Vance campaign has decried the rising price of eggs as a byproduct of the Biden Administration’s economic policies. The Consumer Price Index indicates that the current rate of inflation is 2.4% and on a downward trend,[1] but certain data show that the price for food has increased by an average of 25% across urban cities in the United States since 2020. And while the Consumer Price Index indicates that the current rate of inflation is 2.4% and on a downward trend,[2] certain data show that the price for food has increased by an average of 25% across urban cities in the United States since 2020.[3]But while the term “price gouging” has been used in political rhetoric to describe sustained, increased prices for goods resulting from sellers trying to increase profits, the act is legally defined under certain state laws as a seller charging more for a good or service than permitted under a temporary statutory price cap during a [4]
declared state of emergency. This requirement of a triggering, emergency event applies in the nearly 40 states that have adopted price gouging laws. Price gouging laws are in place in nearly 40 states. This requirement of a triggering, emergency event is required. ), Tammy Baldwin (D-Wisc. ), and Bob Casey (D-Pa.) and Representative Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) reintroduced the Price Gouging Prevention Act of 2024, which provides that it is unlawful for “a person to sell or offer for sale a good or service at a grossly excessive price, regardless of the person’s position in a supply chain or distribution network”–where the term “good or service” is defined to include “any good or service offered in commerce.”[5] The purpose of the Act is to empower the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and state attorneys general to enforce the federal ban “on grossly excessive price increases” and “crack down on greedflation by finally prohibiting price gouging and holding corporations accountable for raising costs excessively.”
Less than a month later, in March 2024, the Biden Administration launched a Strike Force on Unfair and Illegal Pricing to be led by the FTC and Department of Justice (DOJ), which was designed to “strengthen interagency efforts to root out and stop illegal corporate behavior that hikes prices on American families through anti-competitive, unfair, deceptive, or fraudulent business practices.”[6] Months later, the FTC and DOJ hosted a Strike Force meeting that included several federal agencies, during which FTC Chair Lina Khan said the FTC would be investigating why food prices are “too costly” while “many large grocery chains are still raking in enormous profits.”[7]
Chair Khan emphasized that the FTC was launching this investigation [8]because[9] prices for essentials remained high years after the pandemic, underscoring that the FTC is considering enforcement options to address pricing regardless of whether a triggering event has occurred.Each of these actions has been untethered to any pending state of emergency, but recent catastrophes have added momentum to the push for federal action to address price gouging. For example, in response to Hurricanes Helene and Milton, Vice President Harris issued a statement on October 9, 2024, cautioning that “the Administration is monitoring for allegations of fraud and price gouging and will hold those taking advantage of the situation accountable.” On the same day, the FTC, DOJ, and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau issued a joint statement warning that they would be investigating reports of alleged price gouging and that “[10]
he Antitrust Division and its law enforcement partners will act quickly to root out anticompetitive behavior and use every tool available to hold wrongdoers accountable.”[11] The next day, a bipartisan group of congressmembers wrote to Chair Khan to ask her to consider the FTC’s current authority to address price gouging and whether a “federal ban on price gouging [t] enable the FTC and state attorneys general to combat price gouging more effectively than is currently possible?”[12] And on October 30, 2024, a group of 15 state attorneys general wrote to House and Senate leaders asking Congress to adopt a federal price gouging law that “complement[would] state prohibitions . . . “[13]Given that the federal government is eager to get involved in policing alleged price gouging, sellers should be on the lookout for the passage of federal statutes or regulations to address price gouging. This will likely do nothing to address–and may add to–the uncertainty interstate sellers face when dealing with the patchwork of price-gouging laws throughout the United States. Moreover, given the appetite we have seen for the federal government to get involved with policing alleged price gouging, sellers should be on the lookout for the passage of federal statutes or regulations to address price gouging, which will likely do nothing to address–and may add to–the uncertainty interstate sellers face when dealing with the patchwork of price gouging laws throughout the United States.[s]Sellers should take inventory of their pricing practices, adopt best practices for setting prices, and document reasons for increasing prices.[14]
Under most state laws as well as the proposed Price Gouging Prevention Act of 2024, price increases directly attributable to cost increases are generally not considered price gouging. Sellers should adopt policies to encourage good hygiene when documenting pricing decisions. To the extent sellers are adopting dynamic pricing, zone pricing, or algorithmic pricing tools, sellers should consider whether it makes sense to adopt protocols that prevent significant, automated price increases unless such increases have been reviewed and the justification for the price is documented.
- Sellers should consider whether it makes sense to adopt an emergency pricing plan. Similar to the guidance above, if a seller’s prices are set according to a plan implemented pre-emergency, this may give rise to a defense against price gouging claims depending on the jurisdiction. Such plans should detail what economic factors are driving the pricing schema.
- For further discussions regarding price gouging enforcement (and other enforcement priorities at the FTC and DOJ), please join us on November 6, 2024 for our webinar on “Competition Crosshairs on the Food and Beverage Industry: DOJ and FTC Priorities in a Changing Administration.”FOOTNOTES
- Press Release: Vice President Harris Lays Out Agenda to Lower Costs for American Families, Harris Walz (Aug. 16, 2024). Samuel Lovett, Why Team Trump is talking about eggs (and Democrats cry foul), The Times (Oct. 25, 2024).
Paul Davidson, Inflation slowed again, new CPI report shows: Will the Fed keep cutting rates?, USA Today (Oct. 10, 2024 8:37 AM, updated Oct. 10, 2024 4:41 PM).
Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: Food in U.S. City Average, FRED Economic Data | St. Lous Fed, (last visited Oct. 31, 2024).
[1] E.g., Cal. E.g., Cal. Remarks by Fed. Id.
[2] Statement from Vice President Kamala Harris Warning Against Price Gouging, Whitehouse.gov, Oct. 9, 2024).
[3] Justice Department and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau warn consumers about potential scams and price gouging after Hurricanes and other natural disasters, Office of Public Affairs U.S. Dep’t of Justice, (quoting Manish Kumna, Lina Khan (Oct. 10th, 2024).
[4] Letitia James, Attorney-General of New York et al. The Honorable Mike Johnson Speaker of the House et al. (Oct. 30, 2024).
[5]
