House Budget Resolution Aims at Balance Tax Cuts and Spending
The House Budget Committee released a resolution on the budget that specifies significant reductions in taxes and spending for the next decade. This will allow the expiring provisions to be extended.
Cuts and Jobs Act and possibly other taxes. Only Republican votes are required under the reconciliation process, but a majority of Republican votes is needed due to their slim majority. The House Budget Resolution caps the deficit growth due to tax cuts at $4.5 trillion for the next decade, and requires that a minimum $1.2 trillion be cut from spending. The resolution also sets a goal of reducing mandatory spending by $2.4 trillion over the next decade. If this is not achieved, the cap on tax reductions will be reduced accordingly. The budget deficit would increase between $2.5 trillion and $3 trillion over the budget period, before taking into account the impact on economic growth. Medicaid, student loan relief and the Supplemental nutrition assistance program are likely to be reduced. It allows the Judiciary, Armed Services, and Homeland Security Committees to increase spending by $300 billion, likely to fund immigration and defense priorities.
House lawmakers have set a goal for real economic growth of 2.6 percent annually. This will not be possible without a concerted effort to focus on the most progrowth reforms. These include not only tax and spending reforms but also regulations and other policy areas. In the tax space that points to reforms with the largest “bang for the buck” (i.e., those that generate the most long-run economic growth per dollar of revenue loss, such as expensing for capital investment and simplifying reforms for taxpayers).
Tying spending reform to this year’s tax reform effort moves the package in a fiscally responsible and pro-growth direction, and there are several good reasons to do so.
First
, spending growth has far outpaced
inflationInflation is when the general price of goods and services increases across the economy, reducing the purchasing power of a currency and the value of certain assets. The same paycheck will cover less goods, bills, and services. It is sometimes called a “hidden” tax, as it makes taxpayers less wealthy due to increased costs and “bracket-creep”, while increasing government spending power.
has been growing in recent years, and is expected to continue doing so. This will be the highest sustained level in the history of the country. According to the Congressional Budget Office, spending under the current law will surpass 23 percent of GDP in this year, and 24 percent by the year 2032. These levels were previously only temporarily reached during major crises such as World War II, 2008-9 financial meltdown and the worldwide pandemic 2020. The fastest growing budget components are mandatory spending and interest payments on debt. By 2033, they will account for more than 19% of GDP, which is more than the entire federal budget in the late 1990s and the early 2000s when the federal government last had surpluses. Second, spending cuts are the least economically harmful way to reduce deficits. Tariffs are not without their downsides. As we have shown, while they can generate substantial revenue, there are many. Tariffs are a burdensome tax on US importers and US exporters, and they lead to less efficient supply chains, unstable international relations and higher prices for American consumers and business. Raising other taxes – especially those that increase the effective marginal tax rate on income – generally suppresses growth by reducing incentives for people to work, save and invest. According to the CBO, federal investment spending only delivers about half of the economic returns as private sector investments. Many of the studies examining how deficits “crowd-out” private investment distinguish between tax and spending changes, finding more detrimental effects of deficits caused by spending changes.
Also, spending cuts generally lead to a more sustained, successful reduction in debt. Economists produced a large amount of literature examining debt and fiscal consolidation episodes that occurred in the US and other countries over the past few decades. In a study covering 16 OECD nations over a 30 year period, Alberto Alesina’s research found that cuts to transfer payments had a near zero impact on economic growth, while cuts to government spending and other types of expenditures modestly reduced economic growth. In contrast, most fiscal reforms based on tax increases have been followed by a “prolonged and deep recession.”Examining fiscal adjustments from a sample of 26 countries from 1995 to 2018, a Mercatus Center analysis found that successful consolidations, defined as one where the debt-to-GDP ratio declines by at least 5 percentage points in the three years after the plan is implemented, were more spending-focused than tax-focused. Among the successful fiscal consolidations, on average, 60 percent of the deficit reduction came from spending cuts, whereas among the unsuccessful fiscal consolidations, 74 percent of the deficit reduction came from tax increases.
Third
, a substantial amount of spending now runs through the tax code in the form of refundable tax credits and other tax preferences that deserve scrutiny and reform. The Treasury Department estimates that refundable tax credits are expected to reduce federal revenue by $3.6 trillion in the next decade. This includes $1.2 trillion for several green energy tax incentives, which were expanded and extended as part of Inflation Reduction Act. And about $1 trillion for the Affordable Care Act’s health insurance premium assistance. Tax credits are different from deductions and exclusions, which reduce the taxpayer’s final tax bill.
. The House Ways and Means Committee is the main tax-writing committee of the United States. It is one of the 29 committees of the U.S. House of Representatives. The House Ways and Means Committee is responsible for all bills that relate to taxes and revenue generation as well as spending programs such as Social Security, Medicare and unemployment insurance.
The details will matter, but the framework of the House budget resolution should encourage policymakers to pursue reforms that improve economic growth. The details will matter, but the framework of the House budget resolution should encourage policymakers to pursue reforms that improve economic growth.
Stay informed on the tax policies impacting you.
Subscribe to get insights from our trusted experts delivered straight to your inbox.
Subscribe to our Newsletter
Share this articleTwitter
LinkedInFacebook Email
