Supreme Court allows DHS end parole for half a million non-citizens
The Supreme Court cleared the way on Friday morning for the Trump administration revoke the Biden Administration’s grant to over 500,000 noncitizens In a short, unsigned order the justices paused the ruling of a federal Massachusetts judge that temporarily barred federal government from implementing Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Justice Ketanji brown Jackson, joined by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, dissented in an eight-page dissenting opinion from Friday’s decision She wrote that she felt her colleagues “plainly botched up” their decision today and that the “devastating effects of allowing the government to abruptly disrupt the lives and If they are unable to do so, then they must either leave the country or remain in custody of immigration authorities. The federal immigration law gives the DHS Secretary the power to grant them parole and the discretion to revoke it. Alejandro Mayorkas was the DHS Secretary during the Biden Administration. He granted these immigrants parole and then extended it in the hopes that this would discourage illegal migration across the Noncitizens with a positive background check, a sponsor in the United States willing to provide support and a background-checked could be granted permission to After his second inauguration in January 2017, President Donald Trump issued an executive order instructing DHS Secretary to terminate all “categorical parole programs,” including the CHNV program Noem made this announcement on March 25, in a Federal Register notice that explained that these programs “have at worst traded an unmanageable number of illegal migrants along the southwest In an order issued on April 14, U.S. district judge Indira Talwani prohibited DHS from terminating CHNV programs without a case-bycase review of Talwani agreed with the federal court that courts could not review the DHS secretary’s decision to revoke a particular parole determination, but she ruled that this bar
After the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit rejected DHS’s request to put Talwani’s order on hold, the Trump administration came to the Supreme Court, asking the justices to intervene.
U.S. The Solicitor General D. John Sauer said that Talwani’s order had “nullified” one of the Administration’s most consequential immigration policies. It The majority of the court granted Trump’s request two weeks after the briefing was completed and 11 days after it allowed the Trump Administration to end protected status for another group of Venezuelan Talwani’s order was put on hold until the appeal is heard by the 1st Circuit, and if necessary the Supreme Court. The court did not explain its decision, as is typical for cases that are on the emergency docket. In her dissenting opinion, Jackson stressed that the decision not to pause an order of a lower court “doesn’t reflect a quick assessment Jackson continued that the Trump administration failed to prove that it would suffer permanent harm if it did not end the parole grant now, instead of waiting until the dispute was resolved. Jackson noted that this is especially important when the court has agreed to expedite its review of the Trump administration’s appeal. Jackson says that the noncitizens involved in this dispute face “significant” problems, which “far outweigh” any harm to the government. She noted that many of these noncitizens “arrived in the United States (at the U.S. Government’s invitation) because they were subjected
Even if the Trump administration can ultimately end parole, Jackson explained, she would first allow the federal courts to resolve that “highly consequential legal issue.” “Instead,” she lamented, the Supreme Court has allowed the Trump administration to “do what it wants regardless, rendering constraints of law irrelevant and unleashing devastation in the process.”
Posted in Emergency appeals and applications, Featured
Cases: Noem v. Doe
Recommended Citation:
Amy Howe
Supreme Court allows DHS end parole for half a million non-citizens
SCOTUSblog
(May. 30, 2025, 12:34 PM),
