Mergers & Acquisitions

How Beautycounter Fell Apart, Sinking Almost $700 Million With It

Carlyle, the global private equity firm, has $425 billion in investor money powering companies that make aerospace equipment, wind turbines and airport terminals. But this year, when the firm experienced one of its biggest failures, it was on account of little bottles of cleansing scrubs and vitamin C serums sold in people’s living rooms.

Three years ago, in May 2021, Carlyle invested roughly $600 million in a skin care company called Beautycounter. Jay Sammons, who ran Carlyle’s consumer products business, had already helped OGX hair care products generate high returns for Carlyle. He had been watching Beautycounter’s progress under its charismatic founder, a woman named Gregg Renfrew, and reckoned it could be even bigger.

Ms. Renfrew had built the decade-old company around a mission: making cosmetic products without a host of commonly used chemicals. The products were distributed through independent sellers in a multilevel marketing model that has been used for vitamin supplements, cosmetics and Tupperware. Beautycounter was like a newfangled Mary Kay with an additive-free gospel and bottles of $87 antioxidant cream.

When Carlyle bought its controlling share, Ms. Renfrew got about $50 million for selling part of her stake, according to three people with direct knowledge of the deal, and stayed on as chief executive. She and the private equity firm were aligned in their big plans: Raise annual sales from where they stood, about $400 million, to $1 billion, and take Beautycounter public.

“I felt like I’d gotten engaged or won the lottery,” Ms. Renfrew said in a recorded virtual meeting with Carlyle’s Mr. Sammons and Beautycounter salespeople not long after the deal closed. “I couldn’t be more excited about partnering,” she said, referring to both Mr. Sammons and Carlyle.

The excitement faded quickly. The partnering, too. Within three years, Beautycounter would be shut down, and Ms. Renfrew would be trying to salvage the pieces. All the money that Carlyle had put into the company was lost, making it one of the worst investments in the firm’s 37-year history.

In a written statement, Carlyle said: “Early in our investment, Beautycounter faced competitive pressures and postpandemic challenges in the direct selling channel. Despite Carlyle’s efforts and significant additional capital to revive the brand, these challenges persisted.”

This article is based on interviews with sellers and on more than a dozen interviews with current and former executives, employees, board members and investors at Carlyle and Beautycounter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to speak publicly, feared repercussions or cited pending litigation. Ms. Renfrew declined to be interviewed.

Beautycounter’s demise didn’t surprise Ken Wasik, the head of the consumer investment banking group at Capstone Partners. Multilevel marketing companies typically have “a very strong founder that defines the culture,” he said, and that culture is hard to change. “The problems happen when people buy it and think they can take it mainstream.”

The question, he said, is “why did Carlyle expect something different would happen here?”

Ms. Renfrew had already started and sold one company — a wedding e-commerce site — before becoming “obsessed” with the chemicals in skin care products, she told The New York Times in 2018. Beautycounter, which she founded in 2011 and is based in Santa Monica, Calif., helped popularize the idea of “clean beauty” — promising never to use an extensive list of additives, including formaldehyde and synthetic fragrances.

She called on a community of ardent promoters, most of them women, who evangelized to their families, friends and neighbors. Not only did they hawk sugar scrubs, cleansers and creams, they also sold the idea of selling by recruiting others. And they got a cut of all the sales in their networks.

The brand took off. At one point, Beautycounter counted 60,000 sellers, first referred to as consultants and, after Carlyle bought the brand, as advocates.

Renee Hill, who lives outside Nashville, started selling Beautycounter products in 2016, just a few weeks before the birth of her fifth child. She introduced her mother and close friends to the brand. Over time, she personally recruited about 40 people, who then brought in others and expanded her network to 400 sellers, giving her a yearly income in the low six figures.

Ms. Hill had been approached about other multilevel marketing gigs in the past, but had turned them down. Beautycounter’s clean beauty promise felt different, she said.

“It made it really easy as well to not feel slimy about offering somebody a network marketing opportunity,” she said, “because I felt so passionately about what we were doing and how we were doing it.”

Ms. Renfrew treated the independent sellers as a crucial part of her team, sharing details about the business and personal ones about herself, too. They even joined Ms. Renfrew on trips to Washington, where they lobbied for more regulation in the personal care industry. The sellers were motivated: In 2020, the company, which became profitable the previous year, hit $395 million in sales, according to two people familiar with the financials.

Almost as soon as Carlyle bought the brand, however, sellers started to leave and Beautycounter sales started to drop. It was a shocking reversal for the company, which had seen sales grow sharply month after month for years. (Some details of the firm’s downfall were previously reported by Fast Company.)

The board, which was controlled by Carlyle and included Ms. Renfrew, grew concerned and decided to bring on a new chief executive with expertise in the mainstream beauty industry. (At the time, Carlyle executives ascribed the drop in sales to sellers’ declining enthusiasm for working as pandemic lockdowns lifted and they found other things to do, three people familiar with the discussions said.)

Marc Rey, who had held senior roles at L’Oreal USA and Shiseido, took over in February 2022. He split his time between Miami and the Santa Monica headquarters, where Ms. Renfrew, who was given the title of chief brand officer, was based.

A few months into Mr. Rey’s tenure, the company dropped a bomb: Top sellers would be subject to a new compensation system that drastically reduced their commissions.

In multilevel marketing companies, a big chunk of the profits goes to sellers rather than to investors or back into the company. Ahead of the sale to Carlyle, to make Beautycounter more profitable, Ms. Renfrew outlined a plan to change the compensation structure by no longer giving sellers a commission from their recruits’ personal purchases, three people familiar with the discussions said. That structure was not unusual for multilevel marketers.

Ms. Renfrew wanted to tell the sellers and give them a year before the plan went into effect. But the company announced the change in April 2022, and it took effect two months later.

When Ms. Hill, the seller in Tennessee, received her monthly check in June, it was more than 60 percent less than the previous month’s. She spent the next few days calling around to people in her network and was distressed to hear that some of them, too, were being hit.

“It’s one thing when you’re impacted,” Ms. Hill said. “It’s another thing when you bring your entire network of people that have looked to you and trusted you for leadership to see them impacted.”

Marc Rey, who replaced Ms. Renfrew as Beautycounter’s chief executive in early 2022, stayed only 15 months.Credit…Leon Bennett/Getty Images

That July, Mr. Rey held a Zoom call with sellers who collectively brought in tens of millions of dollars. He told them that he would “go to bat for them,” according to a lawsuit against Beautycounter, Carlyle and Ms. Renfrew that was later filed in Minnesota by sellers.

Still, according to the lawsuit and three people on the call, Mr. Rey took a dismissive tone, telling the sellers not to overreact to the changes. Sellers sent one another texts with messages like “WTF,” as they tried to keep the shock from showing on their faces.

Even more alarming to sellers, according to the lawsuit, Mr. Rey attacked the founding ethos of the company. The sellers, he said, should stop emphasizing “clean beauty,” because it was no longer “sexy” or a clear differentiator in the beauty industry. Instead, Mr. Rey said, the new “sexy” was “the environment.” (Mr. Rey was not named as a defendant in the suit.)

Jennifer Shawgo, a plaintiff in the suit whose network of more than a thousand sellers had generated $35 million in sales over the years, was shocked. “We’re like, ‘But that’s why we’re all here,’” she said.

Mr. Rey denied saying the sellers were overreacting. Nor did he say the company should stop emphasizing clean beauty, he added, but rather he said it should differentiate the brand in other ways as well.

“At a time when a lot of brands claimed that they were clean,” Mr. Rey wrote in an emailed statement, “I did state that it was important for us, as a brand, to also explain” that the company tested for safety and was socially conscious.

The pressure from the independent sellers pushed the company to drop the new compensation plan. But in the meantime, some sellers tried to make up for lost income by working with other multilevel marketers. They were stunned when Beautycounter sent them warnings that a nonsolicitation agreement prevented them from recruiting any of the people they had brought to Beautycounter, according to interviews and another suit filed by sellers against Beautycounter in California.

In the California suit, plaintiffs said these agreements had been included in policies and procedures that they could see only after agreeing to the “terms and conditions” to enroll. They argued that the sellers “do not sign them, have no opportunity to negotiate them and, in many cases, have never even seen them until Beautycounter attempts to use the nonsolicitation restriction against the consultants.”

(A judge in California placed a temporary restraining order on the company’s use of these clauses in March. Beautycounter and Ms. Renfrew declined to comment on the suits. Carlyle, which is not a defendant in the California litigation, has filed a motion to dismiss the claims against it in the case in Minnesota.)

After the compensation changes, some sellers left. Those who stayed had their own disappointments. The open dialogue that they had enjoyed with Ms. Renfrew disappeared.

“We went from knowing pretty intimate details about the direction of the company to completely kind of door slammed in our face,” Ms. Shawgo said.

At the top of the company, things began to spiral. In July 2022, Mr. Sammons, who had been Ms. Renfrew’s closest contact inside Carlyle, left the firm. (He eventually started a private equity firm with Kim Kardashian.)

By the end of that year, Ms. Renfrew left the business and resigned from the board. Carlyle put in an additional $65 million in late 2022 and early 2023.

With Carlyle’s blessing, Mr. Rey spent more than $10 million upgrading the company’s outdated technology and hired consultants. He made a deal with Ulta, one of the largest beauty retailers, to sell Beautycounter products.

Still, even though sales of prestige beauty products in general rose 14 percent in 2022, sales at Beautycounter continued to fall. In May 2023, Mr. Rey was asked to resign, too.

Mindy Mackenzie, a Carlyle executive and Beautycounter board member, stepped in as interim chief executive and started cutting staff and external consultants.

With a burst of hope for the holiday season, the company rolled out a new website last October. It was the culmination of the millions that Carlyle had spent to upgrade the technology. But even that effort was troubled. The site often crashed, and its once user-friendly parts — like the way it would repopulate addresses and loyalty rewards information — stopped working.

In January, Beautycounter’s top salespeople attended a conference at the Four Seasons Resort Oahu at Ko Olina in Hawaii. The mood was darkened by the website meltdowns and the stream of departures; Beautycounter had roughly 35,000 sellers, almost half as many as when Carlyle bought the brand, one person familiar with the company’s financials said. But then Ms. Renfrew surprised the gathering by announcing that she had returned to run the company. Carlyle had wooed her back to boost sales and morale. The audience cheered.

What they didn’t know as they celebrated was that Carlyle would soon walk away from the business.

Carlyle had been looking for a buyer since August. In mid-March, Carlyle handed the business over to its lenders, Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase, which would be in charge of selling what was left. For Carlyle, that meant effectively giving up on a $700 million investment, valuing it at zero.

In April, the company went into foreclosure, and Ms. Renfrew bought the rights to the Beautycounter name and other assets from its lenders for several million dollars. A few weeks later, she stunned the sellers when she announced that it would take months to restart the company.

She and a team are working to resuscitate the clean beauty brand by the end of the year. But even if she revives the company, she might not be able to count on a loyal and enthusiastic sales force. Some former sellers blame her as well as Carlyle for the demise of the company — and their livelihoods.

Ms. Hill, who is a plaintiff in the California suit, stopped selling Beautycounter products in July 2022. Soon after, a letter from the company warned her not to recruit sellers in her network to new multilevel marketing companies. She acquiesced to that demand and has struggled to build a business with two other direct selling companies.

At Beautycounter, she was her family’s main breadwinner, bringing home $177,000 a year; she’s now earning $19,000, according to the suit.

“There’s a lot of damage that has been done,” Ms. Hill said. “I don’t believe I could ever step back into that space.”

Carlyle is getting out of the space, too. In addition to exiting Beautycounter, Carlyle, under a new chief executive, said it would no longer invest in U.S. consumer and retail companies.

Story originally seen here

Editorial Staff

The American Legal Journal Provides The Latest Legal News From Across The Country To Our Readership Of Attorneys And Other Legal Professionals. Our Mission Is To Keep Our Legal Professionals Up-To-Date, And Well Informed, So They Can Operate At Their Highest Levels.

The American Legal Journal Favicon

Leave a Reply